So You Want to be an Airline Pilot...

Blay Whitby 4.4.99


There's an old aviation story, usually credited to Jimmy Doolittle, who was a
famous American stunt pilot in the 1930's. At a posh cocktail party a lady
guest happened to ask the barnstormer what he did for a living. On hearing
that he flew daredevil stunts to entertain people at air shows, she commented:
"Isn't that terribly dangerous?"."Oh yes, Ma'am" came the reply, "...the chief
danger in my business is that of starving to death". Any aspiring aviator
would do well to heed Doolittle's implicit warning, for little has changed. It
is true that a Concorde captain receives a reasonable salary, but it is poor
relative to what can expected at the upper reaches of sport, music, or
business; and the chances of making it to the top just as slim, if not
slimmer.

If poverty is no deterrent, there is another hurdle you must confront at the
outset of your aviation career and learn to live with throughout it. That is
the medical. Before even learning to fly you need to convince the authorities
(in this case the Civil Aviation Authority, more of whom later) that you are
fit to do so. A note from your GP won't do, you have to be thoroughly examined
by a team of doctors and specialists who are recognized by the CAA as
specifically qualified in aviation medicine. Aviation works on a GOFAI
'specify, quantify, and ensure a safety margin' principle and, since the pilot
is an essential component of the aircraft system, the doctors, like the
engineers, have to guarantee that there is less than 0.1% chance of failure
during any flight. This is a pretty stringent requirement of a human being and
the medical reflects this stringency. To fly as a private pilot you only need
a class three medical. You need to be able to hear pretty well in both ears,
to see in full colour (remember that about 10% of men can't) and be free from
conditions such as diabetes, epilepsy, and any cardio-vascular problems which,
obviously, might potentially be incapacitating. Women are less likely to have
problems with colour vision, but are, for example, considered medically unfit
to fly if they so much as 'have reason to suspect' that they might be
pregnant.

The class three medical is strict, but not daunting. I have relatives in their
70's still flying regularly. Glasses and contact lenses are acceptable, though
your licence may be endorsed as only valid provided you have at least two
pairs accessible during flight. The glasses have now become part of that 0.1%
chance of failure calculation.

But of course you want to fly for a living, so you're going to need a class
one medical. This is the one that your captain on the transatlantic airliner
has, so you may be reassured by the fact that it is correspondingly more
strict. You need to be able to see in full colour in the dark as well as in
normal light and to hear tones up 20 kilohertz in both ears. Just about
everything is included - I once had a medical certificate refused because they
didn't consider some recent dental work to be of a high enough standard. If
you don't meet the required medical standard, it doesn't mean that you are
unfit in general, but it would be a good idea to find out before going any
further in your aviation career. One consolation is that renewing a class one
medical is easier than convincing the doctors to make the initial issue,
though this is moderated by the fact that you will need to renew every year or
six months (depending on age) and that it is expensive. Everything in aviation
is expensive, so there's no reason for the medical to be cheap. Expect to pay
about 150 pounds a time and more if you need further tests (or dental work!)

Finally you have arrived the point at which you can get around to considering
actually learning to fly. For an airline job, the minimum qualification you
need is a CPL/IR (Commercial Pilot's Licence and Instrument Rating). It would
probably help to have a 'frozen' ATPL (Airline Transport Pilot's Licence - if
you had an unfrozen one, you'd probably have an airline job anyway if you see
what I mean) and some experience flying heavy, multi-engined, jet aircraft.
You could buy training for this licence, but you should budget for a minimum
cost of about 100,000 pounds and considerably more if you want to build up
that heavy jet experience. Did I mention that everything in aviation is
expensive?

Assuming that you are not the son or daughter of a generous oil sheik, you
will need to consider other routes. You might, for example, join the Air
Force, as the Queen has plenty of jet aircraft and is prepared to train people
to fly them. You even get paid while you learn. The Navy also trains pilots,
if you think you'd look better in dark blue. The disadvantages include needing
to sign up for a minimum of 16 years, having to go wherever in the world you
are told to go, and most importantly, that the competition for places as a
pilot is extremely intense. If you are only there to get the flying training,
you will not get far in the selection procedure. If you are only there for the
flying, you won't get far in the services either. If you fail to obtain
promotion into the senior ranks both Air Force and Navy will terminate your
spell with them at an early opportunity (no later than the age of 38). This
has a knock-on effect on aviation careers to we which will need to return.
While we are on the subject of age, the general rule is that you need to be
under 22. This is certainly the case if you want to join the forces a a pilot.
One way or the other, your flying career with them will be over by the time
you are 38. It's a good idea to be under 22 elsewhere in aviation too.

A small piece of good news is that there is, at least for the moment, another
route into aviation which is less expensive. This does not mean cheap for
everything in aviation is expensive, nor does it mean easy. This is known as
the 'self-improver' route. Essentially, if you get yourself a more basic
licence and gain experience in some areas of aerial work, pass the relevant
exams, you can eventually reach that CPL/IR qualification and be of some use
to the airlines.

In detail it might work something like this. First you learn to fly. This part
of the process is universally known in aviation by the Latin tag 'ab initio'.
After a minimum of 40 hours in the air (and much more studying the books) you
take and pass the PPL (Private Pilot's Licence) examination. You should budget
about 4,000 pounds to get to this stage. You are now entitled to fly your
friends and family about in a small single-engined aircraft. (I like to visit
Bembridge on the Isle of Wight, if you want to come along). You will need to
fly your friends and family about quite a bit because you can't go any further
until you have a total of 200 hours experience. One important restriction on a
PPL is that the holder must not 'receive any valuable consideration in respect
of exercising the privileges of the licence'. This means you have to pay
yourself. Hire of even the cheapest aircraft is 80-100 pounds per hour and
there are incidentals like maps and landing fees which are surprisingly
expensive. I believe I already mentioned that everything in aviation is.

Armed with the necessary experience and a class one medical, you can begin to
move towards that goal of a CPL. You need to pass 15 written exams for the
CPL. These cover a extremely wide area from human performance and limitations,
through meteorology, morse code and air law, to engines, electronics and
aerodynamics. It should not surprise you to hear that the CAA charge fees of
about 500 pounds to sit the exams, but it may surprise you to hear that the
pass mark is 75% and most people fail first time. If you really want to go for
the airline job this is the time to start on that 'frozen ATPL' which means
that you should sit the exams for the ATPL rather than the CPL. This includes
extra papers on subjects such as global navigation and requires you to study
climatology as well as meteorology. To achieve a sufficient level of knowledge
requires intense study, but as an academic colleague pointed out, at least
when you study meteorology you can be sure that you are learning about the
real world! You sit the exams in groups of eight or nine papers and have to
complete all of them within a year of starting and the relevant flying tests
within three years.

Talking of flying tests means further training of course. Further training
means further expense and I don't know if it's worth even giving estimates by
this point. You could probably break it down into 5-10 thousand pound chunks
but if you were worried about money you'd have given up long before this
stage. Many people make substantial savings by doing this part of the flying
training and the so-called 'hours building' in the United States. The US
offers better flying weather in many areas, much cheaper aircraft hire, and a
noticeably more positive attitude. I have flown many hours in the US and it is
generally much more fun than in this country. The attitude of the US
authorities seems to be that this type of flying, known as general aviation,
is good for transport, for the US economy, for the US aircraft industry, and
above all, for the freedom of US citizens. The attitude of the CAA seems to be
that all flying should be done by uniformed professionals, preferably trained
in the US, and certainly in US-built aircraft. If the British were given the
freedom to use the skies, they might get a taste for freedom in general, and
no collection of administrators is likely to take that sort of risk.

The usual next step is to take a BCPL (Basic Commercial Pilot's Licence)
needing a minimum 20 hours training and an AFI (Assistant Flying Instructor's
Rating) which requires a further 20 hours training. At this point you can
actually start looking for a flying job. Assistant flying instructors can
teach people to fly, provided they both belong to a recognized flying club and
that it is done under the supervision of a QFI (Qualified Flying Instructor).
For this the CAA generously allow you to 'receive valuable consideration', but
you will be dismayed to find that you have undergone all this training to
receive so little. Most flying clubs pay instructors by the hour and you can
expect to start on about 10 pounds per hour. Remember this is hours actually
in the air instructing, and the British climate will give you many days, or
even weeks, when nothing flies. This is not low pay; it is starvation pay.
Flying instructors are a hollow-cheeked, itinerant bunch, living in caravans
or small rooms near airfields, rushing to get back into the air if they have a
student, or trying to scrounge a sandwich if the weather is bad.

One reason they relish this life is that after 700 hours experience, they can
gain a CPL simply by passing the test. This may involve a little more
training, especially for the Instrument Rating, but 700 hours is great deal of
experience and you will rightly feel that you are an accomplished aviator by
this stage. Flying in varying weather conditions and with varying student
abilities builds qualities usually called 'pilot judgement' which cannot be
acquired from text books or from a short taught course. When airlines recruit,
they like to take self-improvers. These people have demonstrated a great deal
of determination to get to this point and have a great deal of experience of
real flying. It is true that the flying they have experienced is very
different from airline flying, and the aircraft very different from airliners,
but the need to make a cool assessment of a difficult situation may occur
daily for an AFI, whereas for an airline pilot the system ensures that it
happens very rarely indeed. The downside is that passing exams, tests, and
acquiring all this valuable experience will take quite a few years and
therefore make you proportionately less attractive to potential employers.

Now we have got to talking about airlines, you may want to know why they
collude in this system, rather than simply recruiting people and training them
ab initio. The answer is simply, because they can. Remember that there is
constant supply of forces-trained pilots coming on to the market around the
age of 38. In slack times these pilots will completely fill any demand from
the airlines. When business builds up the airlines can usually meet their
needs simply by vacuuming up pilots from the layers of aviation jobs below.
What typically happens is that, for example, British Airways take on some
first officers by poaching them from a charter company which is flying similar
Boeing aircraft, but employing pilots on a seasonal basis or simply paying
them less. The charter company replaces those pilots from a smaller company
flying turboprops and they in turn have to replace their pilots from people
employed in the air-taxi business. Eventually some time-served instructors
will find that they can finally get a job which pays enough to be able to buy
a decent meal. When there is a downturn in the airline business, pilots may
have to trade down. Unlike doctors, lawyers or academics, pilots lose their
qualifications in six to twelve months if they don't actually use them. They
have no option but to fly. This, and the number of people always keen to do
it, ensures a buyers market.

Which brings me to the final point, why do people tolerate this state of
affairs? The answer is actually most eloquently put in Wind, Sand and Stars by
Antoine St. Exupery, though you will find it somewhere in the works of almost
all aviation writers. What these people don't realise, says St Exupery
(meaning those poor, ground-trapped individuals who have never seen a
full-circle rainbow) is that it's all worth it. All the hardships, the
unsympathetic attitude of the authorities - it's all worth it. In that
respect, I submit, it is just the same as philosophy.